Jobs and the Future of Work

The Call for Action is timely and well-judged

Howard Davies
Professor, Sciences Po
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Jobs and the Future of Work?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Innovation is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Innovation

Read the Call to Action

In the early post-crisis phase, there were signs of an exciting new dynamic in global policy-making. The switch from the G7 to the G20 as the centre of economic decisions promised a new era, with all the world’s major economies now inside the tent. The Financial Stability Board was renamed and reinforced as the nerve centre of financial surveillance. A tough new capital regime for banks was agreed in short order.

But that was then. Now progress is much slower. More recent summits have been disappointing: the Cannes meeting was overshadowed by the continuing Greek crisis. There are clear signs that domestic political imperatives have come to the fore, and the interest showed by global leaders in addressing the tougher issues of global economic co-ordination is much reduced. Some of the more forward-looking ideas of the French G20 Presidency, on the reform of the international monetary system for example, have made little headway.

Perhaps sit was ever thus. Old heads shake and say wise things like “all politics are local”. But it would be a great pity to accept that nothing can be done. That is a counsel of despair. In the financial area, which I know best, there are areas where more could be done. The Financial Stability Board could be further strengthened and given institutional form. That was an almost-hidden conclusion at Cannes. It should be pushed forward. The future of international accounting standards  is also of crucial importance. Why can the US SEC not agree to their implementation in the US?

A more engaged  transatlantic dialogue on financial regulation is also needed. There are danger signs of the US and the EU going separate ways on important issues like rating agency regulation, derivatives trading and future banking structures. (Dodd-Frank in the States, and Vickers in the UK offer very different prescriptions).

More urgency in these dossiers would be welcome. It would complement progress on some of the other issues highlighted in the Call for Action, especially related to the resolution of the eurozone crisis, which of course is the most critical issue we face today.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Related topics:
Jobs and the Future of WorkFinancial and Monetary SystemsEconomic Growth
Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How young workers can thrive with AI when they have the right skills

Peter Brown, Kathy Parker and Harriet Newlyn

July 15, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum