Financial and Monetary Systems

Why are so few firms considered “lean”?

Lem Francis
Lean Practitioner, Motiva Enterprises
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Financial and Monetary Systems?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Financial and Monetary Systems is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Financial and Monetary Systems

There are really only a few companies that can truly be considered lean: Toyota, Honda and Danaher…..a couple others…maybe?

Many of the companies that embark on a lean journey, in my opinion, seem to show interest in lean tools when they are convenient, and then the efforts fade away. Lean thinking has been mainstream for more than a decade and there are thousands of people who have been trained and understand lean principles. So why is it surprising to me that less than 20% of those who start only have limited success? The other 80% scrap the effort completely!

Lean is often introduced into manufacturing and gains some quick wins using common tools out on the shop floor. The effort eventually begins to get resistance when it requires support from the other functions as the implementation process moves to the next level. Most often top leadership either does not understand it or is unwilling to embrace the philosophy of servant leadership. Many managers have trouble letting go of some control, allowing front line leaders to make mistakes and learn how to wield the tools of Lean. The lean initiative fades as management loses faith and committed people are reassigned or attrite over time. Short term fiscal priorities become the order of the day and the Lean infrastructure is converted to a “go see what’s wrong” in this department/process.

Here are some of the reasons I believe this lean fanfare-and-fade phenomenon happens. These are a few of my observations, Im sure others could add to this list.

  • Not adopted as a business philosophy
  • Support not in place (servant leadership)
  • Managers who are not committed are allowed to quash efforts
  • Use of “tools” only
  • All functions aren’t committed or involved
  • Good for the plant, but not for senior leaders (it has to start at the top)
  • Home run mentality

When you apply root cause analysis, the reason why the implementation of lean fails at most companies is culture. Not Japanese vs. American, but corporate culture and how committed the company is to the effort. Leadership MUST lead the effort. What most leaders fail to realize is that lean is a management philosophy, not simply a collection of tools for material problem solving. And, most corporate leaders either do not understand its value or do not have the patience and control to implement it. Slow, steady continuous improvement does not lead to immediate recognition, quick promotions or soaring share prices. Successful implementation requires something that is very rare in both people and organizations: constancy of purpose. However, if you stick with it, it is amazing how the little day-to-day improvements add up over time; after a few months, you look back and realize how much has been accomplished.

Published in collaboration with LinkedIn

Author: Lem Francis is a Lean Practitioner at Motiva Enterprises LLC/Shell Oil.

Image: Emma Rose of Britain (L) and Nils Westerlund of Sweden work in the office of the HowDo, a “how-to-do-it-yourself” app,  start-up at the Wostel co-working space in Berlin March 18, 2013. REUTERS.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Wealth management is rife with conflicts of interest. Fee-based investment is the way forward

Gregory Van

July 25, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum