What Ebola has taught us about big data

Gil Allouche
Vice President of Marketing, Qubole
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Data Science is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Data Science

Ebola.

It would be hard to imagine anyone who hasn’t heard of the deadly virus sweeping through Africa. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the epidemic has claimed nearly5,000 lives, and the number is expected to rise.

Up until recently, the disease’s outbreaks were small and centered in rural communities. But soon Ebola began spreading like wildfire. It landed in densely populated environments, like Guinea and Nigeria, and even made its way to the United States. Estimates suppose that if a solid solution and better response aren’t implemented, the number of infections could reach 1.4 million by January.

Big data has become the hot topic and champion of the private sector. Organizations compile massive amounts of information from a variety of sources, then filter and analyze it to better understand trends. It’s the hope that these trends can predict future behavior. For example, banks can use big data to detect fraud, or entertainment companies can use to it create hit television shows.

However, there is tremendous potential for big data analytics in healthcare. Hospitals and pharmaceutical companies are already using it for research and diagnoses. There is also tremendous potential in using big data for disease prevention.

Back in March, HealthMap predicted an Ebola outbreak about 9 days before the World Health Organization (WHO) formally announced the epidemic. HealthMap is a database that sifts through and gathers information from millions of social media posts and other online sources. Then, it uses that data to create a visual report of global disease outbreaks.

The fact that HealthMap was able to anticipate the outbreak gives credibility to the idea of using data in disease prevention. While 9 days isn’t a huge amount of time, further efforts and improvements could could alert us to possible dangers with enough time to send the right personnel to a specific area. Part of the reason Ebola has been so devastating is there weren’t enough resources to contain the threat. If we could read into the trends and send in additional help before a disease spreads, we could greatly mitigate dangers.

In the case of the recent Ebola outbreak, voice and text data from a telecoms provider was used to gain insights into population movements across the region. Combining that information with what the WHO was telling people, it gave clues of where to focus efforts and deliver care. However, while using phone data is useful, one data source isn’t enough. It only provides a partial picture.

Big data analytics require us to combine information from many different sources and analyze them together to understand patterns. Having real-time access to this information would provide authorities with an idea of where there seems to be spikes in emergency calls or hospital visits. It would also require access to health clinic reports, media updates and social media information. Even having information from pharmacies and travel agencies would help provide a more accurate model of danger spots and where future issues could develop.

All this data is great, but it brings added complications of how to store it, and how to analyze and shift through the bulk to find what’s relevant. Companies are working to come up with a number of solutions to handle the demand. Data platforms, like Amazon’s Elastic MapReduce (EMR), have the ability to quickly analyze data in the cloud. Fast is always important, but if we can begin implementing these types of approaches to predict outbreaks, fast could mean a difference in thousands of lives.

Efforts are underway to find a reliable vaccine to fight the disease, and a number of courageous volunteers are providing much needed care. But this epidemic begs another question; what are we going to do if something else hits us? This situation has reminded us we are still vulnerable and unprepared to handle many deadly diseases. There will always be a new virus and we won’t, like in the case of Ebola, always have treatments ready to combat it. By using the data available to us, we can make better predictions and anticipate outbreaks. We can send supplies and care to where they’re needed and focus our efforts to contain these viruses before they have a chance to spread.

This article is published in collaboration with Smart Data Collective. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with Forum:Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Gil Allouche is the Vice President of Marketing at Qubole.

Image: Ward physician Thomas Klotzkowski and doctor for tropical medicine Florian Steiner (L) put on protective suits at the quarantine station for patients with infectious diseases at the Charite hospital in Berlin August 11, 2014. REUTERS.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum