Emerging Technologies

Are there two types of extrovert?

Krystnell Storr
Mic fellow, Mic
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Emerging Technologies?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Behavioural Sciences is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Behavioural Sciences

You probably know the differences between introverts and extroverts, but did you know it doesn’t stop there? According to a study published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, there’s good reason to believe there are two different types of extroverts, each with their own personality types that can be traced back to differences in their cerebral make-ups.

“Many studies have found that there are two domains of extraversion based on self reports,” Tara White, study co-author and professor at Brown University, told Mic.

First there’s the “go-getter,” who’s more assertive, persistent and achievement-driven, the kind of person always raising their hand in class. This is called “agentic extraversion.” Then there’s the “people person,” who is friendly, emotionally warm and great with ice breakers, known as “affiliative extraversion.”

Separating the go-getter from the people person. “I felt that those differences must also be present, to some extent, in the brain,” White said. To test this theory, she and her co-author Erica Grodin from the National Institutes of Health examined a number of brain scans and found that these two types of extroverts do, in fact, have different brains.

White and Grodin examined 83 brain scans from people with a range of personality traits, not all of whom were extroverted. The team then compared the scans of those on the self-reported agentic side with those on the self-reported affiliative side and found a discernible difference.

It’s all a gray matter. In the scans, the researchers noticed a difference in regional concentrations of gray matter, the brain’s outer layer made up of neurons that help process sensory information and deliver nutrients to help the brain fire signals.

So to speak, the more gray matter you have in a given region of your brain, the better that region will work to keep your senses sharp.

People who scored higher on the agentic extraversion measure had greater gray matter in specific regions of the brain as well as the medial orbitofrontal cortex (a small region that sits between the eyes), Grodin explained. People who scored higher on affiliative extraversion also showed increased gray matter in the medial orbitofrontal cortex but not in any other regions.

The team found exactly what they had hoped for: a distinct anatomical difference in the brains of the agentics and the affiliates. Based on past research, it makes a lot of sense.

A 2012 study found introverts have more gray matter in their prefrontal cortex, the region of the brain that helps control thinking and decision making. Another paper found extroverts have more active dopamine receptors and are more sensitive to the social rewards. In a similar way, agentic extroverts may have more gray matter in regions of the brain that are stimulated by rewards than their affiliate counterparts.

Pictures don’t lie. “This is the first study looking at these two types of extraversion in healthy brains,” Grodin toldMic. She said previous work looked at differences in extroverts but only among much older folks.

The researchers still don’t know the answer to whether personality traits are assigned at birth, if certain factors spur the brain to develop this way or if it’s a combination of both.

“The most important thing to note is that there is no way to determine causality from our study,” Grodin said. “We just looked at a picture in time and found relationships between extraversion measures and brain volume.”

Knowing how changes in our head translate into how we act or feel is a step toward understanding what makes humans tick. Either way, this study proves that while many of us are extroverts, that doesn’t mean we’re all the same.

This article is published in collaboration with Mic. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Krystnell Storr is Mic fellow with a Master’s of science, health and environmental reporting from NYU.

Image: A share trader reacts as she sits behind her trading terminal at the Frankfurt stock exchange, October 13, 2008. REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why trust and safety discussions are key to AI safety

Agustina Callegari

August 12, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum