Nature and Biodiversity

Why Ghana needs a new approach to stop the erosion of its coastline

Kwasi Addo Appeaning
Lecturer, University of Ghana
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Nature and Biodiversity?
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Ghana

Ghana’s economic growth rate is expected to pick up again next year after two years of slowdown following the country’s stellar 7% growth in 2013. But this success has come at a price, particularly to country’s 550km coastline. The coastal zone is inhabited by more than one-quarter of Ghana’s population and about 80% of its industrial establishment.

The coastline is home to activities that contribute significantly to the national economy. These include oil and gas production, port operations, thermal electricity generation, coastal agriculture, hydroelectricity generation and fishing.

Some of these activities have led to the erosion of Ghana’s coast. Coastal erosion threatens heritage sites dotted along the coast, natural landing sites of the local fishermen and nesting sites of endangered marine turtles, and hinders developing the full potential of the coastal tourism industry.

What’s doing the damage

The coastal zone is divided into three sections – western, central and eastern. Several activities in these three sections have resulted in changes in the demographic patterns in the coastal zones.

Although the entire coastline is eroding at varying intensity, the eastern section has been identified as the most vulnerable. The area is influenced by the Volta Delta system. Erosion rates reached 8m/year after the construction of the Akosombo dam on the Volta river in 1965, which covers an area of 8502 square km.

Oil and gas production in the western section has resulted in increased migration of people to the area in search of jobs. This has increased stress on the coastal environment and has facilitated changes in the coastal ecology systems.

The migration of people into the area and destruction of vegetation like mangrove swamps exacerbate the erosion problems. Mining of precious minerals along portions of the coast destroys the equilibrium of the beach system and either initiates or intensifies the erosion situation.

Sand mining, which is banned but is still practised along the entire coast for construction purposes, is also having a negative effect.

Environmentally unfriendly interventions

Coastal erosion management in Ghana is reactive, site-specific and usually involves using hard engineering approaches. The current approaches adopted by the government are unsustainable and environmentally unfriendly.

Groynes is one such approach. This is a form of coastal protection in which barriers are built into the sea to prevent erosion. They essentially trap the sand and stop them from moving too far from the coast.

Concrete or wooden structures, known as revetments, have also been built to act as a barrier against sea waves in a bid to stop the effects of coastal erosion. The revetments absorb the waves energy preventing the cliffs from eroding.

Ghana’s government usually offers groynes and revetments to communities when there has been a complaint. While they stabilise the shoreline at the protected section, they increase erosion elsewhere.

In addition, major sea defence projects have been carried out by government on sites considered to be highly vulnerable. These include the Keta Sea Defence Project, Ada Sea Defence Project, Sakumono Sea Defence Project and the New Toakoradi Sea Defence Project, among others.

These projects involved a combination of revetment and groynes. But the site-specific interventions are having knock-on effects in most cases. The construction of the Keta sea defence, using a combination of groynes and revetments, has led to increased coastal erosion on the down-drift coast towards the Ghana–Togo border by over 50%.

What’s missing

What is lacking is a comprehensive management policy. This has prevented the development of a sustainable strategy in managing coastal erosion.

Future projections of erosion along the coast of Ghana indicate that the present coastal buffer zones would be completely eroded by 2100. Also, between 2052 and 2082, coastal erosion is projected to catch-up with important landmark features such as the Christiansburg Castle, Ghana’s independence square and the Densu Ramser site in Accra – which are all located within the coastal zone.

The vulnerability of the coastal zone is expected to increase significantly as a result of climate change and its associated sea level rise. Sea level rise will increase the direct inundation of low-lying areas, facilitate rapid erosion of the soft shores and increase offshore loss of sediment as well as flooding. It is estimated that a one metre increase in sea level will inundate a significant portion of the Volta Delta system in the eastern section.

There is therefore the need to tackle coastal erosion management from an integrated approach using the green concept of managing with nature and not against it. Adopting the shoreline management plans will enable a large-scale assessment of the risks associated with coastal processes and present a long-term policy framework to reduce these risks to people and the environment.

This article is published in collaboration with The Conversation. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Kwasi Addo Appeaning is Lecturer in Marine and Fisheries Sciences at University of Ghana.

Image: Groynes at the Keta Sea Defense Project on Ghana’s coast. Kwasi Addo Appeaning

The Conversation

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

From blocked views to free food: How holiday destinations in Japan, Denmark and more are tackling overtourism

Gabi Thesing, Ian Shine and David Elliott

July 25, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum