What developing countries can learn from Alaska
![](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_lVbspH1VbXvXYpxOry73u3w1eGW2EhlYmuq8WVn793Q.png)
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
United States
I recently returned from vacation in Alaska, America’s final frontier. This place is massive, twice as big as Texas. It’s so remote that many of the conveniences Americans take for granted simply aren’t available. Prices are high, cell-phone coverage is sparse, and the state capital, Juneau, isn’t even accessible by road. It’s wonderful in summer, but during winter there are only six hours of dim sun.
For the 737,000 people who call Alaska home, life can be a challenge most of the year. The economy relies heavily on energy extraction (80% of state revenue is from petroleum) and the federal government (subsidies and military spending), plus fishing and tourism.
Alaska is not poor. With so much oil, its per capita real GDP ranks first among the U.S. states.
How it got there is fascinating, and I cannot help but notice the similar dynamics going on in many developing countries today. What we experience today — pristine nature and peaceful society — has a troubled past. From subsistence living not many centuries ago, this isolated place went through a series of booms and busts.
The most notable booms were the fur trade in the 19th century, the gold rush at the turn of 20th century, the Great Depression boom (large farmer settlement as part of a government stimulus program), the World War II military spending boom, the oil boom in 1970s, and today a mild boom in tourism (a record 2 million visitors in 2014). Like salmon runs, the booms have been unbelievably strong, then suddenly disappeared.
Unlike salmon runs, life on the frontier is unpredictable and often miserable. But over time, people have always returned to chase their dreams. The development of this frontier has been littered with abuses, including environmental disasters, social abuses, and corruption. This is development at its worst.
At the same time, Alaska provides many examples of development at its best: a cycle of creation and destruction, pollution and cleaning up, again and again, individuals trying their best against all odds, until Alaska reached the affluent and peaceful state it is in now.
Today, Alaska is no longer a frontier. It has mellowed into middle age. The wilderness is carefully managed and monitored. People come here from all over the world to work. They expect a good salary in a safe working environment. They are not seeking a fortune in the rollicking Wild West.
Other than smoke from a forest fire, I saw nothing disturbing during the entire trip. I am sure there are drug problems and other social ills, but Alaska’s development challenges are largely behind it now. After the oil wealth is gone, the natural beauty may become its biggest asset, an asset that will only appreciate over time if well-preserved.
Without its historical struggles, would Alaska have become the success it is today? It’s an open question.
As I was riding the White Pass & Yukon summit train — a civil engineering landmark on par with the Panama Canal and Eiffel Tower — I tried to bring myself back to the territory’s filthy and violent early days, and wondered what I would have done in those situations of extreme danger and hope.
Alaska is a little tree in the global development forest. What can we learn from its story as we aim to end poverty by 2030?
The feeling that more can be done in frontier markets kept hitting me hard. There are many lessons the development community can draw from frontier places like Alaska.
First and foremost, I believe we should have a deeper understanding that there can never be a linear line of progress. There will be ups and downs, and conditions may deteriorate before they improve.
This is not to say today’s frontier markets must suffer from exactly the same growth pains as Alaska in order to develop — modern technologies have made it possible for us to avoid some of the challenges — but it does mean we must have a holistic and long-term perspective.
This post first appeared on the World Bank’s Voices Blog. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.
To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Author: Ted Chu was appointed Chief Economist of the International Finance Corporation in September 2014.
Image: The Yakutat Glacier feeds into Harlequin Lake near Yakutat, as seen during a flight over southeastern Alaska October 7, 2014. REUTERS/Bob Strong
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Economic GrowthSee all
Simon Torkington
August 30, 2024
Andrea Willige
August 6, 2024
Omair Ansari and Manahil Javaid
August 6, 2024
Tarini Fernando and Nadia Shamsad
July 18, 2024