Why the gold price tumble could continue
![](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_tTbG2_AHJ8HPkbepnAotN1Gw--E-J5Hkf4ft52kzswM.jpg)
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Mining and Metals
The tumbling price of gold could settle more than 75 percent lower than it was in 2012, according to updated research from the Duke University Fuqua School of Business.
Professor Campbell Harvey argues that historical patterns suggest gold could fall as low as $350 per ounce.
In 2012, when gold was trading at $1,700, Harvey successfully predicted the price would drop. He published research showing that if gold kept up with inflation, it should have been $825 per ounce. Since then, gold has plummeted in value, shedding more than $600 per ounce.
In his new research, Harvey revisits his forecast. He argues there is substantial risk the price could fall much lower than $825.
“Based upon what we have seen in the past, gold could drop as low as $350 per ounce,” Harvey said.
The updated paper, “The Golden Constant,” was produced with Claude Erb, a former asset manager.
Harvey’s predictions are molded by the historical relationship between the price of gold and inflation measures, plus the movement over time of gold price adjusted for inflation — known as the real price of gold.
The average real gold price multiplied by the U.S. Consumer Price Index — a common measure of inflation — provides a measure known as the “golden constant.” The Golden Constant hypothesis suggests that in the very long-term, the price of gold is driven by inflation and that deviations in the price relative to inflation will be corrected.
Harvey says there are at least two ways to look at the current historically high real price of gold. One is that the real price of gold may “mean revert” towards the golden constant. That would generate a price of about $825 an ounce.
But if the price were to overcorrect, it could fall much lower.
“In a golden constant context, $350 an ounce is the downside risk to the price of gold,” given the historical behavior of gold prices, the paper states.
The golden constant, Harvey points out, is not a fact, but a lens through which the price of gold can be viewed. It is analogous to price-earnings ratios — the ratio of share price to per-share earnings. When the P/E ratios get very high, a correction is more likely.
“The high and low real prices of gold highlight that even if there is on average a golden constant, the real price of gold has strayed, and probably will stray, far from this possible central tendency,” the paper states. “It is also possible that the future will be unlike the past.”
This article is published in collaboration with Duke. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.
To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Authors: Gregory Phillips and Erin Medlyn are writers for Duke.
Image: Gold bars are seen at the Czech National Bank in Prague April 16, 2013. REUTERS/Petr Josek.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Economic GrowthSee all
Spencer Feingold
September 4, 2024
Simon Torkington
August 30, 2024
Andrea Willige
August 6, 2024
Omair Ansari and Manahil Javaid
August 6, 2024
Tarini Fernando and Nadia Shamsad
July 18, 2024