Fourth Industrial Revolution

Will we ever see a robot in the White House?

A technician makes adjustments to the "Inmoov" robot from Russia during the "Robot Ball" scientific exhibition in Moscow May 17, 2014. Picture taken May 17, 2014. REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin

A technician makes adjustments to the "Inmoov" robot. Image: REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Agenda

We’re all aware of the potential threat of automation to our jobs, but by 2020 even the leader of the free world could be feeling the pressure.

Advances in artificial intelligence and the arrival of the Fourth Industrial Revolution could be bringing the idea of a robot president a step closer to reality. IBM’s Watson supercomputer has already been challenged to a debate by fringe presidential candidate Zoltan Istvan.

“I think in 2020 you will see a field emerge with competing AI robots for president, who want to debate and discuss policy,” he told Newsweek.

‘President Watson’?

A campaign page has been set up for Watson to run for president. However, The Watson 2016 Foundation, which is running the campaign, is independent of IBM, so the supercomputer is unlikely to be running for president this time round.

Supporters of a robot president see clear benefits of artificial intelligence running the country. Advanced AI systems have the ability to process vast amounts of information, and make unbiased, reasoned decisions on a wide range of issues.

So what’s stopping the automation of the presidency?

Well, a number of things.

As with all job automation, it’s about developing technology advanced enough to be capable of fulfilling the role. As the following graphic highlights, machines are simply not yet able to meet the social, creative or physical demands required for many jobs.

Running the world's biggest economy is a job with high expectations, as well as some more basic ones. A robotic interloper would need to be able to think and speak like a human, with a grasp of emotions and empathy. Such technology remains a long way off.

It would involve an AI system passing the Turing Test – often considered the pinnacle of artificial intelligence development. The test stipulates that if you cannot differentiate between a human and a robot, then AI will have shown its ability to think like a human.

While there is much debate about the test, including whether it neglects certain aspects of humanity, developing a robot capable of human-like thought remains a daunting hurdle.

Several high-profile names have warned of the risks sophisticated AI could pose to mankind. Professor Stephen Hawking told the BBC in 2014: “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”

Along with Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and hundreds of others, Professor Hawking signed a letter in 2015 warning of the dangers of artificial intelligence.

Then there would be legal, and philosophical, barriers to overcome. The US constitution states that:

“No person except a natural-born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

In a Washington Post article, several potential issues are discussed. The questions of whether a being a person is the same as being human, and whether a robot could ever be considered a person, have no clear answers. Whether a robot can be considered ‘a natural-born citizen’ would also need to be decided.

Equally, the issues of whether a robot can be considered at least 35 years old and a ‘resident’ of the United States would need addressing.

Finally, a robot would need to win enough votes to enter office. Whether an AI system could gather enough support remains to be seen.

As the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs report highlights the Fourth Industrial Revolution will cause widespread disruption to labour markets. However, a robot in the Oval Office by 2020 does look unlikely.

Have you read?

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Fourth Industrial Revolution

Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Fourth Industrial Revolution is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

We asked 5 tech strategy leaders about inclusive, ethical and responsible use of technology. Here's what they said

Daniel Dobrygowski and Bart Valkhof

November 21, 2024

Why is human-first design essential to the future of the internet?

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum