Leadership

Does writing more emails make you more successful?

An employee types on a computer keyboard with both Latin and Cyrillic letters in Sofia June 23, 2008. Bulgaria applied on Monday to register an Internet domain name in Cyrillic script as part of efforts to boost national pride amid a growing influence of English. REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov

Image: REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov

Joe Myers
Writer, Forum Agenda
Share:
Our Impact
What's the World Economic Forum doing to accelerate action on Leadership?
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

leadership

We’ve all become used to using digital tools to communicate with our colleagues, even if they’re sitting right next to us. But does this tell us anything about individual performance?

Yes, according to Chantrelle Nielson, who directs research and strategy for organisational productivity analytics at Microsoft. Writing in Harvard Business Review, she explains how email and other communication tools are linked to individual performance.

“Email and other tools are surprisingly relevant to the core performance of individuals and the business in three interesting ways,” she says.

Can your email use predict your performance?

Data suggests that it can. During a year-long collection of anonymised email data at a software company, the highest performers were shown to have stronger internal network ties.

These high performers had 36% more strong internal ties, connecting at least biweekly in smaller group chats. On the other hand, low-performers had a network 6% smaller than average.

Nielson writes: “The size and strength of peoples’ networks actually helped to predict year-over-year changes in performance better than managers could.”

Can it predict potential?

As with performance, there is a link between potential and networks.

High-potential employees have networks 52% larger than the average. However, in a study of a large utility company, it was also shown that a sub-group of high-potential employees, with smaller internal networks, can exist.

This group often has great ideas, but lacks the extraversion or emotional intelligence to reach a wider audience. Identifying these employees and matching them to well-connected employees could help them and the business.

Is size everything?

No, it’s about quality as well as quantity. A network with more influential people will be more effective than a network of the same size containing fewer influential connections.

Understanding the power of internal communications and networks can benefit both employee and employer.

As Nielsen explains: “Digital communication that’s seen as a burden may turn out to be a blessing for employees and organizations. But in order to enable our uniquely human skills, like building relationships and coaching each other to do better, any insights must be used thoughtfully and with both technology and people in mind.”

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Innovation Prize: Meet the next generation of changemakers

Natalie Pierce and Maria Sol Adaime Gabris

July 11, 2024

About Us

Events

Media

Partners & Members

  • Sign in
  • Join Us

Language Editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

© 2024 World Economic Forum