Sending money to Africa? It will cost you
![A gambler counts out cash while making a proposition bet on Super Bowl XLV at the Las Vegas Hilton in Las Vegas, Nevada January 27, 2011. The Pittsburgh Steelers and the Green Bay Packers will compete in Super Bowl XLV in Arlington, Texas on February 6.](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_AfzoYC41inV-WP4KAKIAaWwv7b9v-s-iwR1DZ6w4JVE.jpg)
Sending remittances to Africa are more expensive than any other region, data from World Bank shows. Image: REUTERS/Las Vegas Sun/Steve Marcus
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Africa
For many Africans, remittances are hugely important. Money sent by relatives abroad often represent a significant income source. This importance also extends to countries as remittances account for a chunk of GDP with estimates pegging yearly remittances to sub-Saharan Africa at over $30 billion.
Important as they might be, sending these remittances home can be burden for both senders and receivers as transaction costs for sending remittances to Africa are more expensive than any other region, data from World Bank (pdf) shows.
The high costs of remittance transactions are often borne by people sending money to and those receiving them in developing countries as in 2014, 74% of the global remittance total went to developing countries. If remittance costs are reduced to 5%, World Bank estimates suggest that migrants could save $16 billion annually, leaving both senders and receivers with more money in their pockets. There are already efforts to reduce these costs. The Valletta Summit on Migration last November affirmed commitments to reduce remittance costs to 3% by 2030.
For most of sub-Saharan Africa, these high costs are driven by a number of factors particularly low levels of financial inclusion and a lack of access to banking services. Compared to global averages, costs of remittance transactions to sub Saharan Africa have stayed consistently significantly higher.
Money transfer operators, a popular choice for senders, are now the cheapest medium to send money costing less than post offices for the first time since 2013. Banks, however, remain the most expensive channel to send remittances, costing almost double.
![Banks remain an expensive channel for sending remittances.](https://assets.weforum.org/editor/neTd4viOTIxTFBJeY3CalV81pqtnI5K5_fop7sM-OGg.jpg)
While most of the remittance inflow to Africa comes from outside the continent, sending money within Africa is also expensive as South Africa is home to one of the world’s highest remittance rates. In the fourth quarter of 2015, it cost less to send money from the United States to Kenya than it was to send from South Africa.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Geographies in DepthSee all
Tariq Malik and Prerna Saxena
July 12, 2024
Ange Chitate
July 10, 2024
Ratnesh Bedi, Asheesh Sastry and Toong-Yuen Chong
July 3, 2024
Why Asia’s time is now: what's fueling Asian growth and what does it mean for the rest of the world?
Neeraj Aggarwal and Aparna Bharadwaj
June 24, 2024
Duncan Zheng
June 24, 2024