Happiness might make you less creative. This is why
![Paint in different colors are seen on a table at an art class for children in the city of Hanau near Frankfurt, Germany, March 7, 2016. REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach - RTSAWBS](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_Spoj2g2id63j3RKdBJToguCxck-s5D3VidmEHVIVM3c.jpg)
Intense emotional pressure, good or bad, can cause dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex. Image: REUTERS/Kai Pfaffenbach
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Neuroscience
Corporations intent on making employees more engaged and creative are focusing on happiness as the answer. Chief Happiness Officer is an actual job at many companies.
But most scientists say that creativity calls on persistence and problem-solving skills, not positivity. Computational scientist Anna Jordanous at Kent University and linguist Bill Keller of Sussex University in England dug through through over half century of study on the creative process in various fields, and isolated 14 components of creativity. Happiness wasn’t one of them.
Creativity is complex. The 14 components Jordanous and Keller found all need to work together to varying degrees depending on the task at hand, the researchers explain. None is more important than any other although different creative activities—and different steps of a single creative effort—may demand more of one or another and build on each other.
Mark Davis, a psychologist at the University of North Texas Department of Management divides creativity into two phases; initial idea generation and subsequent problem-solving. His review of research on feelings and creativity concluded that a positive mood is useful when first brainstorming, processing information, and coming up with as many ideas as possible—you don’t want to bring judgment into that, because it could stifle idea generation.
But rigor is the key to overcoming obstacles and completing tasks—and good mood doesn’t improve problem-solving, which involves judgments that almost by necessity won’t feel good: critique and evaluation, experimentation and failure. The stress that arises from problems may be unpleasant but it also motivates us to complete tasks, Davis says. In other words, negative emotions are actually beneficial to the creative process.
Likewise, Rice University psychology professors Jennifer George and Jing Zhou have found that challenges don’t necessarily make us happy, but they do yield good creative work. That’s because, their work found, when bad moods or feelings are expressed they signal problems—which then inspires fixes and improvements. Over 160 employees reported on manager support and personal moods during a week while their bosses assessed them on their creativity. The workers who were rated most creative reported experiencing both strong negative and positive moods and felt they had supportive managers. Happier workers with good bosses, however, were rated significantly less creative than those with mixed emotions. Employees with mixed feels and bad bosses rated least creative.
That said, psychologists aren’t suggesting that you live in an emotional maelstrom for creativity’s sake. Emma Seppala, Science Director at the Stanford University Center for Compassion and Altruism and author of The Happiness Track explains, “High-intensity positive emotions can sometimes be just as taxing as high negative emotions. Creativity does not so much happen when we are stressed and highly emotional.”
Amy Arnsten, a neuroscientist at Yale University School of Medicine, says brain science backs that up. To maintain optimal brain function for creativity, she says, mood management is key, not happiness or purposefully-generated-stress. Intense emotional pressure, good or bad, can cause dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), an area of the brain known to be involved in creativity.
The PFC responds to emotional stimulus by releasing a flood of dopamine, which is good, within limits. But wild, out of control feelings trigger an excess, leading to PFC dysfunction, impairing judgment and hindering creativity, says Arnsten. To accurately evaluate our work and determine what’s next in the problem-solving process, we need some cool. Feeling too good about what we do can blind us to the truth that the work’s not quite there yet.
Arnsten explains that as long as we feel the task can be completed we won’t get so stressed that our PFC shuts down, and we will manage uncertainty and unhappiness, remaining motivated and ultimately coming up with creative solutions.
Trying to solve problems can be frustrating, and lead to desperation exasperation, or anger. But those negative moods work for us too, helping us see ideas through to a happy end. We may grimace along the way, but it’s a small price to pay for sparks of genius.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Emerging TechnologiesSee all
Agustina Callegari
August 12, 2024
Sebastian Buckup
August 12, 2024
Adrian Kuenzler and Dylan Reim
August 6, 2024
Jo Adetunji
July 31, 2024
Ahmed Mazhari
July 31, 2024
David Elliott
July 29, 2024