Google's Eric Schmidt on the decision making advice managers need to know
![Eric Schmidt, chairman of Alphabet Inc., speaks during the SALT conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. May 17, 2017. REUTERS/Richard Brian - RTX36A29](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_9X716Yg9o7kBGR2WVUT0Bw7HG5ks2Cxn9VHiUFwNRdo.jpg)
"The most important thing to do is to have quick decisions." Image: REUTERS/Richard Brian
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
leadership
Eric Schmidt is the executive chairman of Alphabet, the parent company of Google and one of the most influential conglomerates in the world.
But when he joined Google in 2001, it was a search engine company with a few hundred employees that was still three years away from an IPO.
By the end of Schmidt's decade-long tenure as CEO, Google grew to around 32,000 employees and $38 billion in revenue.
It was his first few years as CEO, when annual employee growth nearly quadrupled and revenue more than doubled, that taught him the foundation of both his and all of Google's management philosophy, he explained to LinkedIn cofounder and chairman Reid Hoffman for an episode of Hoffman's "Masters of Scale" podcast.
One aspect of this approach was to give employees an unusual level of freedom, allowing them to experiment and bring fresh ideas to leadership. The other aspect was training that leadership to act quickly, determining whether those ideas were worth acting on.
"The most important thing to do is to have quick decisions," Schmidt told Hoffman. "And you'll make some mistakes, but you need decision-making."
Schmidt and Google's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, formalized their various teams' meeting agendas, so that every employee knew they would get a weekly chance to present a plan that Google's leadership team could choose to act on or not. Emphasis was placed on efficiency.
"I cannot tell you how many people have told me that at Google decisions are made today quickly in almost every case, even at our current scale," Schmidt said. "And that's a legacy of that decision. Most large corporations have too many lawyers, too many decision-makers, unclear owners, and things congeal, they occur very slowly."
Schmidt noted that even when Google chose to acquire YouTube in a $1.6 billion deal in 2006, the decision process took only 10 days.
At Google, Schmidt explained, it's clear whose responsibilities are what, and decisions don't get caught in bureaucratic limbo.
"Even if it's the wrong decision, a quick decision is better than almost every case," he said.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on LeadershipSee all
Natalie Pierce and Maria Sol Adaime Gabris
July 11, 2024
Andre Hoffmann, Nolita Thina Mvunelo and Felix Rüdiger
July 10, 2024
Natalie Pierce
July 10, 2024
Ionica Berevoescu, Julie Ballington and Lana Ačkar
June 24, 2024
Gareth Francis
June 21, 2024
Pim Valdre and Nicolas Salomon
June 19, 2024