How do we decide if an animal is extinct?
![An Iberian lynx, a feline in danger of extinction, is seen after being released as part of the European project Life Iberlince to recover this species in Donana National Park, southern Spain, February 15, 2016. REUTERS/Marcelo del Pozo/File Photo - S1BEUBLSUZAB](https://assets.weforum.org/article/image/large_l1BJU0Z1Mck5J1Cy-gIaaqRdtlimLTZSnXxtcafg4z0.jpg)
An Iberian lynx, an endangered wildcat, is seen after being released as part of a conservation project. Image: REUTERS/Marcelo del Pozo/File Photo
![A hand holding a looking glass by a lake](/uplink.jpg)
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:
Future of the Environment
Extinction. How would you define it?
For Oxford Dictionaries, it’s a species “having no living members.”
So far, straightforward. Even so, the central challenge is not defining what being extinct means, but judging when a species has finally lost its battle to survive. That is a complex and lengthy process, involving reams of data, complicated mathematical models and finely balanced calls. And it’s one that’s becoming knottier as biodiversity loss accelerates.
Human impact
“The planet is in the midst of the Earth’s sixth mass extinction. And we are the driving factor,” International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Director-General Inger Andersen said in February. “Species can be brought back from near the brink of extinction through good conservation and protection investments, through sound policies and smart interventions. But once a species is extinct, it is forever, and there is no coming back.”
Accurately measuring and defining species that are in trouble forms a key piece of conservation work.
While the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, which began in 1964, does much of the heavy lifting, its assessment categories show just how thorny the issue is. Several different ranks exist including “extinct”, “extinct in the wild” and “possibly extinct” as well as “critically endangered (possibly extinct)”, and “critically endangered (possibly extinct in the wild)”.
After looking at more than 96,500 species, IUCN estimates more than 26,500 are threatened with extinction, including 40% of amphibians and 25% of mammals. The “possibly extinct” list includes Indonesia’s Aru flying fox – a species of megabat with no recorded sightings since 1992 – and the Christmas Island shrew, last spotted in 1985.
These nuances underscore how arduous and fallible the process is, and it helps to explain why years of careful monitoring and planning can still result in error. Recently a thought-to-be-extinct giant tortoise was uncovered in the Galapagos Islands.
“To find a living tortoise on Fernandina Island is perhaps the most important find of the century,” said Wacho Tapia, Director of the Giant Tortoise Restoration Initiative. “The only live specimen of the species from Fernandina was found 112 years ago.”
Spotting a leopard
It’s not the only case of something springing up where it wasn’t expected. A black leopard was photographed in Kenya this year – the first confirmed sighting in Africa since 1909.
![A rare black leopard caught on camera.](https://assets.weforum.org/editor/5yZKoUS_1yOwZTr4NyBRUd4yqITdvv963kqpEV1WEVQ.png)
These animals coming back from the brink – others may become extinct before they’ve even been discovered – provide an illustration of the challenge facing those seeking to quantify the losses.
In the end, the accuracy of such lists comes second to raising awareness. Seeking to apply data and numbers to nature’s destruction is about painting as full a picture as possible, to inform better planning and policy making and to raise awareness. Environmental issues and caring for the natural world were key themes at this year’s World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos.
The Forum’s Global Risks Report 2019 said humanity was “sleepwalking its way to catastrophe” citing extreme weather, failure to act on climate change, and natural disasters as key risks. Alongside these mounting hazards, there’s an increasing awareness of a need to act.
“The IUCN Red List tells us where we ought to be concerned and where the urgent needs are to do something to prevent the despoliation of this world,” Sir David Attenborough said. “It is a great agenda for the work of conservationists.”
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Nature and BiodiversitySee all
Akanksha Khatri
August 15, 2024
Henna Hundal and Sikander Bizenjo
August 8, 2024
Tom Crowfoot
August 7, 2024
Gabi Thesing, Ian Shine and David Elliott
July 25, 2024
Kate Whiting
July 23, 2024