What’s the difference between carbon negative and carbon neutral?
Becoming carbon negative requires a company to remove more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than it emits. Image: REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov
This article has been updated.
- Businesses and governments worldwide are racing to prove their green credentials in the face of stark environmental data.
- Many have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality or to reach net zero, but what do these separate terms actually mean?
- The World Economic Forum’s Equitable Transition Initiative unites a global coalition to drive an equitable green transition, creating principles, tools and business strategies that address both climate change and inequality.
It’s getting hard to read the news without coming across a company promising to “reach net zero” or go “carbon neutral” or even become “carbon negative.”
And, so far, around 145 governments have announced or are considering net zero and carbon neutrality targets, covering nearly 90% of global emissions. But what is the difference between carbon neutrality and carbon negativity, and why does this distinction matter for businesses and governments striving for climate action?
Here's a guide to the different pledges and how to compare them.
Net zero, carbon neutral or carbon negative?
Net zero: Net zero means that any carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere from the company’s activities is balanced by an equivalent amount being removed.
Carbon neutral: Carbon neutral is slightly different, allowing companies to measure the amount of carbon they release and offset that with a reduction in emissions or a removal of carbon. This can include buying carbon credits to make up the difference, making it appealing to companies that produce a lot of emissions.
Carbon negative: The next step – becoming carbon negative – requires a company to remove more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than it emits.
What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?
New pledges, new responsibilities
Global warming and other environmental concerns are rising up business' agendas, in the face of stark environmental data. The United Nations says climate change is the defining issue of our time and without drastic action, adapting to the changes it will bring will be difficult and costly.
Companies are in the spotlight since studies show they’re responsible for the lion’s share of greenhouse gas emissions, creating a blanket of gas that traps heat and raises Earth’s temperature.
Some businesses have been accused of “greenwashing” – overstating their eco credentials to garner favourable publicity – or setting headline-grabbing goals that look too far in the future and aren’t measurable.
But for many companies, the narratives have changed, acknowledging the need to find long-term solutions that create real impact.
Business strategies for carbon negativity
Companies aiming for carbon negativity are adopting ambitious strategies that go beyond traditional carbon neutrality efforts. These approaches focus on not only reducing emissions but actively removing more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than the company emits.
Key strategies include:
- Aggressive emissions reduction: Businesses are setting ambitious targets to significantly reduce both direct and indirect emissions, including those from their supply chains (Scope 3 emissions). This involves assessing and minimizing the carbon footprint of all operations.
- Investment in carbon removal technologies: Businesses are exploring a portfolio of negative emission technologies, including afforestation, soil carbon sequestration, and direct air capture.
- Renewable energy adoption: Switching to 100% renewable energy sources is a crucial step in decarbonization efforts.
- Supply chain engagement: Companies are working with suppliers to reduce emissions throughout their value chain.
- Contribution-based approach: Some organizations are moving beyond offsetting to actively contribute to climate projects that remove carbon from the atmosphere.
- Long-term commitment: Carbon-negative strategies often involve multi-decade plans, with many companies aiming to be carbon-negative by 2030.
By implementing these strategies, businesses are not only addressing financial and reputational risks associated with carbon-intensive products but also positioning themselves as leaders in the transition to a zero-carbon future.
The World Economic Forum’s Equitable Transition Initiative brings together a global coalition to shape an equitable green transition through the development of actionable tools, principles and business strategies.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Net Zero Carbon Cities
Forum Stories newsletter
Bringing you weekly curated insights and analysis on the global issues that matter.
More on Sustainable DevelopmentSee all
Federico Cartín Arteaga and Heather Thompson
December 20, 2024