Health and Healthcare Systems

The one factor that could determine whether you keep or lose your job during a recession

Lawyer Timon Karamanos, 40, works from home, following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in Athens, Greece, June 24, 2020. Picture taken June 24, 2020. REUTERS/Alkis Konstantinidis - RC22HH94NLHN

The pandemic has forced millions of people to work remotely.

Image: REUTERS/Alkis Konstantinidis

  • In both the 2008 recession and today's pandemic-related recession, teleworkable occupations have proven to be more resilient, according to data from the IMF.
  • Not only can teleworking satisfy social distancing measures, but people working in those roles tend to be more highly-skilled and educated, and therefore less vulnerable to recessions.
  • Young and low-skilled workers have been shown to be significantly more vulnerable in both recessions.

There has been much discussion in recent months about how workers who transitioned to working from home—and those who were deemed “essential”—are less affected by the layoffs and job losses brought on by lockdowns than are workers in “social” jobs that require closer human interaction, like restaurant workers. However, our new IMF staff research suggests that this does not tell the full story.

In particular, we find that while teleworkable jobs are indeed more secure than non-teleworkable occupations during the current pandemic-related recession, this pattern has also been observed during the global financial crisis of 2007–09—meaning that something more than pandemic-related restrictions is at play.

Coronavirus covid virus health healthcare who world health organization economics imf international monetary fund work from home remote working change global
In both recessions, teleworkable jobs have proven to be secure. Image: IMF

As the chart shows, unemployment has increased less for teleworkable occupations during both recessions. This pattern suggests that people in teleworkable occupations tend to keep their jobs not only because they satisfy the need for social distancing and other novel requirements of the current pandemic, but also because such people tend to be more highly-skilled and educated—and hence less vulnerable to recessions.

The paper also finds that essential jobs have been less affected not only during the current recession but also during the global financial crisis. On the other hand, while social jobs have been severely affected during the current recession, they were indeed less affected during the global financial crisis.

Our research also confirms some interesting observations regarding the distributional aspects of recessions. It finds that young and low-skilled workers have always been harmed more in recessions, while women and Hispanics are more severely affected during the current recession. Women in particular are more likely to work in industries and occupations that are being affected more severely during today’s recession. During both recessions, low-income workers have suffered more than top-income earners.

Accept our marketing cookies to access this content.

These cookies are currently disabled in your browser.

Accept our marketing cookies to access this content.

These cookies are currently disabled in your browser.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo

Forum Stories newsletter

Bringing you weekly curated insights and analysis on the global issues that matter.