Green trade will be the focus of this year’s World Trade Organization Public Forum. Here’s everything you need to know

First there was globalization. Then came talk of deglobalization. Are we now heading for greenbalization?

“The future of trade is green,” says World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General: Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. “Trade can support national and international efforts to keep the ambition of limiting global warming to 1.5°C alive.”

The specific ways in which trade can contribute to a greener and more sustainable future will be the focus of the WTO’s Public Forum on 12-15 September.

Taking place at the WTO’s headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, the Public Forum will feature around 90 interactive sessions, with topics including The Route to Transport Decarbonization, Green Energy Investments in Africa and Promoting Smallholders’ Inclusion in the Advancement of Green Trade.

Developments in international trade and sustainability are well covered by Forum Agenda and the Forum's monthly Trade Sketchings newsletter on LinkedIn, which you can sign up to here.

Here’s a round-up of some of the green trade highlights of this year, to get you up to speed ahead of the WTO Public Forum.

Efforts towards socially sustainable supply chains are not only a moral imperative, but also indispensable for ecological, legal and economic reasons.

While the global electrification of the automobile industry will support the environmental side of sustainability, it will also massively multiply demand for raw materials, increasing dependency on mining industries with poor human rights records and other environmental issues.

Ensuring social sustainability in these areas not only supports human rights, but also tends to lead to more diversified and more resilient supply chains. Deeper evaluation and transparency when it comes to supply chains also allows companies to make decisions based on a more in-depth factual analysis. However, supply chain due diligence requirements need to be carefully implemented, to avoid these becoming a paperwork exercise with little impact.

Green subsidy schemes, such as those rolled out by the US and EU, encourage private-sector climate action, but they also risk leaving developing and emerging economies behind. They could also lead to trade tensions that hurt green technology supply chains.

Local production requirements for batteries and electric cars have been criticized as trade-restrictive practices that violate agreements underpinning the multilateral free-trade system.

We asked five experts to weigh in on what the subsidies underlying the US Inflation Reduction Act and EU Green Deal Investment Plan mean for the future of climate change and trade.

eveloping countries need almost $6 trillion to implement their pre-2030 climate commitments. Foreign direct investment (FDI) has a role to play in meeting these needs – we call this “climate FDI”, meaning investment that is aligned with and supportive of climate goals.

However, climate FDI flows are below their potential in many developing economies. That can be for a range of reasons, potentially linked to investor concerns unrelated to climate, or sector-specific where projects are capital intensive or offer long time horizons for a return on investment.

The World Economic Forum’s Guidebook on Facilitating Climate FDI suggests four categories of measures that can help change this.

A Coalition of Trade Ministers on Climate was launched at the World Economic Forum's Annual Meeting in Davos this year.

It brings together trade ministers from over 50 countries with the aim of boosting international cooperation on climate, trade and sustainable development.

The Coalition co-chairs from Europe, Kenya, New Zealand and Ecuador told us more about what the initiative plans to do, and how it hopes to do it.