What's in the new Building Chips in America Act and what does it mean for the semiconductor industry?

Semiconductor chips

Semiconductors are used in many advanced technologies Image: Jiahao Li/Flickr

Ian Shine
Senior Writer, Forum Agenda
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Advanced Manufacturing is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
Stay up to date:

Advanced Manufacturing

  • The Building Chips in America Act has removed the need for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for semiconductor manufacturing projects that are receiving government subsidies.
  • It is intended to speed up approvals, but critics say it removes an important environmental safeguard.
  • The World Economic Forum initiative Future-Proofing Global Value Chains: Country Preparedness and Beyond is helping manufacturing companies respond to disruptions caused by emerging technologies, climate change and geopolitical tensions.

“On Wednesday 2 October 2024, the president signed into law the ‘Building Chips in America Act of 2023,’ which exempts certain projects relating to the production of semiconductors from environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.”

So reads a tiny update on the Briefing Room section of the White House website that could have – and is, indeed, intended to have – significant implications.

Chips – also known as semiconductors – are at the centre of most technologies driving the future economy, from AI, computers and electric vehicles to solar panels, healthcare devices and military weapons.

Their importance is underlined by the fact that global semiconductor sales rose more than 20% on the year in August to their highest ever level for the month, according to the US Semiconductor Industry Association.

Worldwide semiconductor revenues
Global semiconductor sales rose more than 20 percent on the year in August to their highest ever level for the month. Image: US Semiconductor Industry Association/World Semiconductor Trade Statistics

Sales are rising fastest in the Americas, with a 43.9% spike in August compared with a year earlier.

However, only about 10% of the world's semiconductors are produced in America, down from 37% in 1990, according to The New York Times. The US would prefer more production to be homegrown for national-security and supply-chain reasons. The US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and CHIPS and Science Act are designed to help achieve this, by offering tax credits, loans and grants to incentivize production.

But they do not appear to be working as well as was hoped for, with around 40% of major manufacturing projects announced in the first year of the IRA and CHIPS Act facing delays, according to The Financial Times.

The new Building Chips in America Act is designed to remedy this.

What is the Building Chips in America Act?

The Building Chips in America Act 2023 removes the need for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for semiconductor manufacturing projects that are receiving government subsidies through the CHIPS and Science Act.

NEPA reviews require federal agencies to “incorporate environmental considerations in their planning and decision-making through a systematic interdisciplinary approach. Specifically, all federal agencies are to prepare detailed statements assessing the environmental impact of and alternatives to major federal actions significantly affecting the environment.”

The NEPA also provides the public with the chance to review and comment on environmental evaluations.

Opponents of the change say it will allow companies to “skirt an important step aimed at reducing potential harms to the environment and workers”, according to the New York Times.

But supporters say that semiconductor developments will still be subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental and permitting rules.

NEPA reviews could take years, potentially causing delays in completing … projects, without providing significant additional environmental benefits,” the US Semiconductor Industry Association says. “The Building Chips in America Act will help ensure these new facilities get up and running in an expeditious and environmentally responsible way, which will help maximize the CHIPS Act’s positive impact on America’s economy, national security and supply-chain resilience.”

What environmental impacts can semiconductor manufacturing have?

US environmental organization the Sierra Club says that semiconductor manufacturing is “notorious for its extensive use of the toxic ‘forever chemicals’ known as PFAS [per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances]”.

It claims that the Building Chips in America Act will “remove the last remaining federal lever to assess the impact of massive semiconductor fabs on drinking water, air quality, climate change and community health”.

Semiconductor fab emissions primarily come from scope 1 process gases and scope 2 electricity consumption
Semiconductor manufacturing has been linked with various environmental impacts. Image: McKinsey

The most senior Democrat on the US Natural Resources Committee, Raúl Grijalva, says it is “unconscionable” to allow semiconductor facilities “to completely bypass NEPA’s critical environmental review and public input processes”.

However, the bill’s co-author, Democratic Senator Mark Kelly, said it was “not a rollback of any environmental laws”, as developments will still need to meet key environmental protection laws such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.

Have you read?

He also pointed out that the bill only exempts projects from NEPA reviews if they have started construction by the end of this year or if federal financial assistance does not make up more than 10% of their total cost, The New York Times reports.

Why does the US need the Building Chips in America Act?

Boosting semiconductor production has been a central plank of President Joe Biden’s economic policy. The reasons include “bringing semiconductor supply chains home, creating jobs, supporting innovation and protecting national security”, according to the White House.

Discover

How is the World Economic Forum contributing to build resilient supply chains?

Kelly says the Building Chips in America Act was devised “to make sure that the CHIPS and Science Act had the maximum impact on our economy and our national security”.

The bill’s other co-author, Republican Senator Ted Cruz, says that streamlining the permitting process by removing NEPA reviews is “a crucial step in onshoring jobs and making our country less dependent on China for semiconductors critical to national defence”.

Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CNBC that the new legislation would allow companies to build semiconductor facilities more quickly. “Of course, we care deeply about clean air, clean water and the environment,” she commented. “That being said, this is a national security imperative. We have to act with urgency and go as fast as possible.”

World Economic Forum initiative Future-Proofing Global Value Chains: Country Preparedness and Beyond is helping manufacturing companies anticipate the ongoing reconfiguration of global value chains and identify the best responses to disruptions caused by three megatrends – emerging technologies, climate change and geopolitical tensions.

As the semiconductor industry becomes even more important all around the world, it will become increasingly important that it manages its ecological footprint as efficiently as possible. It will also have to work with governments and international bodies to ensure that supplies are able to reach every corner of the globe – whether through domestic manufacturing or international trade – to avoid the kind of shortages seen at the start of 2023.

Loading...
Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Share:
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum