3 steps to get more women into tech
Earlier this month Apple released new diversity figures for its US workforce, which revealed women make up only 30 percent of the company, taking up 20 percent of tech roles and 28 percent of leadership positions. These are numbers CEO Tim Cook says he is “not satisfied with.”
Meanwhile, at Google, 30 percent of global employees are women. But only 17 percent of tech roles and 21 percent of leadership positions are filled by women. At Facebook, women constitute 31 percent of employees but fill only 15 percent of tech positions and 23 percent of senior level roles. Stats at Twitter, Yahoo and Intel—all of whom should be commended for voluntarily disclosing these employment figures—are surprisingly similar.
After reading this, I wanted to see how my company stacked up. Among Hootsuite’s roughly 600 employees, 40 percent are women and they fill 23 percent of tech roles and 38 percent of leadership positions. This comes out a bit better—but certainly not much—than at the other companies. What exactly are we doing differently and, more importantly, what we can we do better?
Culture: Tech’s “hostile macho cultures”
I don’t think the impact of workplace culture can be overstated. Although we may have a youthful spirit at my company—foosball, taps in the office, rooftop parties—we’ve tried to avoid the testosterone-drenched fratboy atmosphere that sometimes prevails at startups. To the extent we’ve succeeded, I think this might have something to do with being based in Vancouver, a city with a history of liberal politics and ideas. But it also has a lot to do with the group of people who started the company and their own role models.
Anecdotes don’t carry much weight in the data-driven startup world, but I’ll briefly say that my mother was an entrepreneur herself. She ran a clothing boutique in a small town. She encouraged me to start my first business when I was still in high school. So to me, there was never anything remotely out of place about women in startups.
I think as a result we were able to embrace the best elements of the Silicon Valley scene—the willingness to take risks, the disrespect for precedent, the relaxed, come-as-you-are office environment—and steer clear of some of the misogyny and other hangups. We hired the best people for the job, and they found an atmosphere where merit and enthusiasm, not gender, mattered. Bringing aboard the right kind of people, in turn, created a virtuous cycle: as we expanded to dozens, then hundreds of employees, the culture we created evolved and thrived thanks to their contributions.
This type of atmosphere can make a big difference. Overall, more than 50 percent of women in private-sector science and tech jobs drop out without returning, according to a 2008 study by the Center for Work-Life Policy. And one of the main reasons cited is “hostile macho cultures — the hard hat culture of engineering, the geek culture of technology or the lab culture of science.”
Companies that enable or encourage fratboy, brogrammer antics—be that in the form of tasteless jokes or rude lingo or general narrow-mindedness—actively alienate women from their workforce. How they can possibly afford to do so—when tech talent is so hard to come by—is another matter altogether. (As entrepreneur and advocate Dan Shapiro notes, “To literally handicap yourself by 50% is insanity.”) Given the apparent pervasiveness of this kind of antagonistic environment, it’s little wonder that a gender imbalance persists.
But there’s another side to this story—obviously related but distinct—that also needs to be told.
Nurture: Girls who code
A major part of the reason there’s a gender disparity in tech is that there are so few women applying for tech positions. Currently, of every 10 people interviewed for a tech role at our office, 9 are men. I don’t think this is unusual. In other words, it’s not necessarily that women are being screened against in job interviews (as the IBM Tweet controversy suggests); it’s that there aren’t a lot of female applicants out there to begin with.
The numbers bear this out. Over the past two decades, the percentage of bachelor’s degrees awarded to women in almost all science and technology fields has increased, sometimes dramatically—with one important exception. “Computer science actually is more male-dominated today than it was two decades ago,” writes the New York Times’ science columnist Catherine Rampell. In 1991, women received 29.6 percent of computer science bachelor’s degrees in the U.S.; in 2010, they received just 18.2 percent.
Something is deterring young women from entering the field in the first place. But when is this happening and why? By the time girls are in high school, tech has often already been ruled out as a career option. Only 1 percent of high school girls express an interest in majoring in computer science in university, according to a report from the American Association of University Women.
Clearly, making headway on gender imbalance requires getting more girls interested in computer science at an earlier age. This isn’t a quick fix or an easy one. It involves rewriting perceptions of programming as a “boys’ thing” and showing that rewarding careers await women as well. Fortunately, there’s a growing movement afoot to do just that.
Efforts are scattered across North America but expanding fast. Started in 2012, Girls Who Code has spawned a nationwide network of clubs and camps to teach young girls everything from mobile design to robotics. Meanwhile, Canada-based Ladies Learning Code has introduced more than 8,000 women and girls to programming since 2011. Concerned about its own gender gap, Google recently pledged $50 million to programs like these and offers a comprehensive list of opportunities on its Made with Code website.
Breaking the cycle
Of course, in the startup world, entrepreneurship and tech often go hand in hand. And the same gender disparities that affect tech roles are even more pronounced when it comes to startup founders. Just 1.3 percent of founders at privately held, venture-backed companies are women, according to a 2012 Dow Jones study.
For me, finding ways to interweave entrepreneurship and tech—and get young women interested not just in engineering but in creating their own businesses—is an absolutely critical step in changing tech culture and addressing the gender imbalance. Women founders, after all, have the opportunity to create their own workplaces, actively redefining the atmosphere and attitudes in the startup world.
Fostering just this kind of shift was the motivation behind starting an entrepreneurial mentorship program called The Next Big Thing. This year, we’re receiving our first group of 10 young entrepreneurs, three of whom are women. Chosen in a competitive process from hundreds of applicants, they’ll spend a six-month residency inside our company, incubating their own startup ideas and getting the technical and business tools to succeed. It’s no accident that the program’s co-founder, Meredith Powell, is a successful entrepreneur herself with a long history of supporting women in tech. The goal is to show participants that both women and men can be a force in the startup world.
The gender imbalance in tech has proved stubborn for good reason: To borrow a line from Children’s Defense Fund founder and social justice activist Marian Wright Edelman, “You can’t be what you can’t see.” Getting young women interested in tech and providing role models is an important step forward (though certainly not the only step). It’s only once women are able to realistically see themselves in tech careers and at the helm of startups that the self-perpetuating old boys’ club myth will start to crumble.
Published in collaboration with Influencer
Author: Ryan Holmes, CEO at HootSuite
Image: Facebook employees work in the design studio at the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, California
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Hyperconnectivity
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.