Financial and Monetary Systems

For emerging markets, local capital is key

Giancarlo Bruno

Emerging market activity appears higher than ever before: hard currency emerging market bond issuance reached a record $480 million last year, driven by global investors’ search for yield. Yet, despite this influx of capital, companies in emerging countries often still have difficulty raising bond proceeds.

The reason is that international bond markets are accessible only to the largest and most well-established companies; most emerging market companies do not qualify. Instead, they rely heavily on banks for their financing needs. The Credit Suisse Research Institute found that, whereas bank financing comprised less than 25% of corporate borrowing in developed markets, it accounted for approximately 50% of corporate borrowing in emerging markets. But bank capital alone cannot satisfy the funding needs of emerging market private sectors. Estimates place the financing gap for SMEs in emerging markets at $1 trillion.

According to this report from the World Economic Forum, encouraging more robust local capital markets – where emerging market corporations can more easily issue local currency debt to local investors – is critical to providing companies with an alternative to bank financing and freeing up bank capital for lending to SMEs. Greater access to capital will spur private-sector growth and, with the private sector providing some 90% of jobs in the developed world, will in turn boost economic growth.

Local corporate bond markets, however, do not develop by themselves. Government actions to foster increased issuer participation, improve investor value proposition, and enhance market efficiency and transparency are necessary. Take the Malaysian and Singaporean governments, whose visions for market development ultimately shaped the unique characteristics of their markets today.

Malaysia is acknowledged as a global expert in Islamic financing – and understandably so, as its sukuk market is the largest in the world. This is no accident: since Malaysia’s passage of the Islamic Banking Act in 1983, the country has prioritized developing its Islamic finance industry with dedicated advisory councils and thorough regulatory frameworks. In 2000, it launched a comprehensive 10-year Master Plan for growing its financial market, including the Islamic finance sector. These efforts have helped the corporate sukuk market grow at over a 21% compounded annual growth rate since 2000. Today, Malaysia’s sukuk market provides MYR 302 billion of financing (approximately $82 billion) for companies across 32 different industries.

In comparison, Singapore is widely recognized as an international financial hub with foreign issuer- and investor-friendly policies. Following the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, Singapore recognized the need to develop corporate bond markets to complement the dominant banking sector and existing equity market. It specifically aimed to create a local bond market that welcomes both domestic and foreign issuers. Starting in 1998, foreign institutions were allowed to issue SGD-denominated bonds. Regulations were fine-tuned in 2009 to qualify high-grade securities issued by foreign entities as regulatory liquid assets. Singapore imposes no capital controls, investment or hedging restrictions, or withholding taxes on interest income for qualifying debt securities. As a result, foreign entities now account for over a quarter of domestic bond market issuances.

What is impressive about Singapore and Malaysia is not the absolute scale they have achieved in their corporate bond markets ($224 billion and $229 billion in market value, respectively – tiny as compared to the $2.8 trillion Chinese corporate bond market). Understanding countries’ market development visions and their subsequent impact is ultimately more important than absolute scale. In Malaysia’s case, the Islamic financing market may be smaller than the traditional debt market, but its establishment helped unlock previously untapped sources of capital.

Many of today’s emerging countries have their own visions for market development. The question is whether emerging countries can successfully execute on their visions of local bond market development, as Malaysia and Singapore have done.

The World Economic Forum report, Accelerating Emerging Capital Markets Development: Corporate Bond Markets, is available here.

Authors: Michael Drexler, Senior Director, Head of Investors Industries, World Economic Forum USA; and Giancarlo Bruno, Senior Director, Head of Financial Services Industry, World Economic Forum USA

Image: Office buildings of housing banks and wealth management funds are pictured in Singapore’s financial district March 17, 2009. REUTERS/Vivek Prakash

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

ASEAN

Related topics:
Financial and Monetary SystemsGeo-Economics and PoliticsGeographies in Depth
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how ASEAN is affecting economies, industries and global issues
World Economic Forum logo

Forum Stories newsletter

Bringing you weekly curated insights and analysis on the global issues that matter.

Subscribe today

How digital platforms and AI are empowering individual investors

Rishi Kapoor

December 20, 2024

How investing in connectivity and digital infrastructure can be a catalyst for inclusion and empowering people

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum