Leadership

Why working in big groups won’t help you solve big problems

Shana Lebowitz
Strategy Reporter, Business Insider

When your team is assigned a tough project, you might assume you’ll get more done by putting your heads together instead of operating independently.

But new research suggests that collaboration is not the most effective route to creative problem-solving.

According to a study led by Jesse Shore, Ph.D., at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business, teamwork helps when you’re gathering information about an issue. But when it comes to solving the problem, you’d do better working in pairs or very small groups.

The researchers based their conclusions on an experiment in which participants played an online game that simulated preparation for a terrorist attack. Everyone was assigned to 16-person groups, some of which were more closely connected than others in terms of who could share information with whom. The task involved first gathering facts about the situation and then coming up with potential solutions.

Results showed that the most closely connected groups found 5% more information than the least closely connected groups. The researchers say that’s likely because the groups were more coordinated in their search, and everyone brought a unique piece of data to the table.

But the least closely connected groups generated 17.5% more theories and solutions than the most closely connected groups. The least connected teams were also more likely to come up with correct solutions.

That’s probably because people in closely connected networks tended to echo each other’s ideas and weren’t as inclined to disagree with a group consensus.

The most important takeaway for business teams is that, whenever possible, projects should be divided into two sections: finding information, and analyzing that information to devise solutions.

In the first part, it’s wise for colleagues to work together in big groups; in the second part, smaller groups are more appropriate.

That leaves individual employees to think as critically and creatively as possible — and increases the likelihood that they’ll solve the problem at hand.

This article is published in collaboration with Business Insider. Publication does not imply endorsement of views by the World Economic Forum.

To keep up with the Agenda subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

Author: Shana Lebowitz is a Strategy reporter for Business Insider. 

Image: Matteo Achilli (R) works with one of his assistants in his office in Formello. REUTERS/Tony Gentile.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Future of Work

Related topics:
LeadershipJobs and the Future of Work
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

'Leadership 2.0' means rebuilding trust in our common purpose

Klaus Schwab

November 18, 2024

Leadership for our times: Build on the past to create a better future

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum