Economic Growth

5 trends for the future of economic growth

Peter Vanham
Previously, Deputy Head of Media at World Economic Forum. Executive Editor, Fortune

Growth in China is slowing, growth in Europe is near zero, and the world as a whole is now in recession in dollar terms. At the same time, income inequality is rising all over the world, and political instability is going up, too. Could a return to economic growth be the cure for these ills? And if so, how do we achieve it?

Peter De Keyzer, chief economist at BNP Paribas Fortis, examined the issue in his book “Growth Makes You Happy”. Taking a long-term perspective, he starts with a simple theory: wealth is determined by two factors, population growth and productivity growth. The latter depends on your ability to innovate. The former is a result of individual choices and the state of healthcare in a country. But which can get us back to healthy growth?

  1. “Demography is destiny”

It’s simple: the more working age people a country has, the more likely it is to have economic growth and increasing wealth. As The Economist noted earlier this year, “people will borrow in their 20s and 30s, save a lot in their 40s and 50s and start running down their savings in their 60s”. The more working age (age 16-65) population you have, the more potential contributors to economic growth, both because of their productivity and their spending.

That helps explain why countries like Italy and Japan, whose populations are shrinking, have a harder time growing their economy than the U.S. or India, where the population is still growing. Of course, the choices politicians make, and a country’s ability to innovate, play a role as well. But to a large extent, the old adage remains true: “demography is destiny”. In principle, that’s good news for many emerging markets, which should continue to see a “natural” economic growth. The picture below shows you exactly which countries are still having that natural growth, and which ones don’t:

workingage

  1. But growing populations also increase the chances for volatile young demographics

The previous insight does not constitute a call for unbridled population growth, though. When a country’s population grows too fast, it is likely to run into trouble: studies show that the higher the percentage of “fighting age” population (16 to 30 year-olds) in a country, the higher its chances for civil unrest, instability and war. The tipping point is when more than 60% of the population is younger than 30. In that case, the chance for civil war is a staggering one in two. It helps explain the difficult transition countries like Congo, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and Palestine are going through.

blog2

  1. For a healthy demographic transition, women hold the key

As De Keyzer writes in his book: “Studies show that lower birth rates are in fact the result of a consistent policy of ensuring the literacy and education of girls (that is, the future mothers). The literacy, education and emancipation of women are probably the best strategies for reducing child mortality in the first place, and the birth rate in the second. Women are thus the key to a lower birth rate and a successful demographic transition.

Can this surprise anyone? When women are better educated, countries are more likely to see a balanced economic growth, because their demographic transition is more balanced, too. In such societies, the demographic pyramid is more likely to be one of “slow expansion” or “low stationary” rather than “fast expansion” (see below).

“Growth Makes You Happy”, Peter De Keyzer, 222p., published by Lannoo, and available for purchase at Amazon

blog1

And that is only the demographic effect. A recent study by the International Monetary Fund showed the other primary effect of giving more women access to better education. It said that “increasing education spending by 1% of GDP in India could boost female labor force participation by 2 percentage points.” Policies in this vein will ultimately create economic growth that is higher and more balanced. Or as Christine Lagarde put it: “by creating opportunities for women and by promoting their economic participation, policymakers can also tackle income inequality.”

  1. “Necessity is the mother of invention” (Plato)

For countries who no longer have a demographic “dividend” of growing populations, the only other way to increase their future wealth is to engineer the second economic growth component: productivity growth. Such is the case for many western countries today, countries such as Japan and Germany have already passed “peak population”.

Necessity is the mother of invention, as Plato knew long ago. It is no coincidence then that the upcoming “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and its accompanying explosion of productivity seems to take off first in countries like Japan and Germany. Japan is increasingly inventing robots that have the artificial intelligence to take on a broad variety of jobs, while Germany leads the push towards “smart factories” in its industry.

  1. The Government with its choices ultimately enables productivity growth

How do we make sure we reap the benefits from artificial intelligence, robots, and other 21st century productivity enhancers? Productivity growth in the 21st century largely depends on innovations, and innovations can come about only if you have a well-educated population, and a considerable amount of research and innovation centers. As Maria Mazzucato would agree, that in turn depends on the emphasis governments put on education, research and development. Private companies and the free market will decide which innovations are worthwhile, but their breeding ground is the level of education a given country has.

In conclusion, education seems to play a decisive role in getting the world back on the economic growth track. To ensure demographic growth leads to economic growth in emerging markets, the emphasis should lie on a smooth demographic transition. That depends on how well educated women are. To ensure the demographic decline in the developed world doesn’t lead to an economic slump, an increased focus on productivity growth is necessary. In the 21st century, that will come mostly from an increased focus on education, research and development in general.

Author: Peter Vanham, Senior Media Manager, World Economic Forum

Image: A woman pushes a baby stroller along the Charles River past the Boston skyline in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States June 10, 2015. REUTERS/Brian Snyder 

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Innovation

Related topics:
Economic GrowthEducation and SkillsFourth Industrial RevolutionYouth Perspectives
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Innovation is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Why AI is Southeast Asia's new engine for profitable growth

Sapna Chadha

November 21, 2024

5 ways to go green: How countries can prioritize both equity and climate action

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum