Economic Growth

Could enterprise zones help us achieve the Global Goals?

Jem Bendell
Founding Director, The Institute for Leadership and Sustainability

In September, member states of the United Nations adopted 17 new Global Goals for sustainable development. These goals include recognition that industrialisation and international trade need to be brought into line with sustainable development outcomes. Social and environmental concerns need to be part of mainstream investment policy rather than being treated as an add-on after economic concerns are addressed. Given the mixed record of business performance on labour and environmental issues, it will be a huge challenge to shift commerce into a more sustainable path. But we have to start somewhere.

“Starting somewhere” is the idea behind the rise of enterprise zones around the world. The idea is that in specific locations, a government and private sector can invest in creating the infrastructure and services needed for efficient business. There are now thousands of such zones around the world, some of which are called Export Processing Zones (EPZs) due to their emphasis on business development for international trade. Some countries, including India, have recently made the promotion of special zones a cornerstone of their economic strategy. In 2015, enthusiasm for special zones spread everywhere, with announcements of new zones even in Cuba and Myanmar.SDGsSource: Jakob Trollbäck 

One problem with this zonal enthusiasm is that many have offered tax breaks for companies that may be illegal under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules on export subsidies. Exemptions for some developing countries come to an end at the close of 2015. Zones urgently need to innovate new means of competitiveness.

What’s the answer? Some investment promotion agencies have been arguing for governments to relax regulations on labour or environmental issues in order to attract more business. That is triggering strong criticism of zones among trade unions and environmentalists. A strategy of relaxed regulations might also backfire given that international businesses increasingly seek suppliers that meet good environmental and labour standards. Factory collapses and fires, worker unrest and pollution-related industrial tragedies in developing countries remind us of the need for high standards of environmental and worker protection around the world, and for multinational enterprises (MNEs) to exercise corporate social responsibility (CSR) throughout their supply chains. It is true that business leaders seek hassle-free commerce, but poor labour and environmental conditions create hassle for modern enterprise, which seeks to excel in quality, agility, and efficiency, not by cutting corners on the basics.

Reducing protections for citizens or the environment would seem an odd way to implement the new Global Goals. Instead, we could learn from those enterprise zones that are leading the way in providing services for their firms to achieve social and environmental excellence. In a survey of 100 zones by UNCTAD, some zones were found to be developing services for cost-effective performance on social and environmental aspects of business, potentially securing a market advantage. In Uruguay, the ‘Zona America’ provides training on business ethics and has programmes for effluent treatment and reducing the consumption of natural resources. Several zones around the world have been certified to the ISO 14001 environmental management system standard, including locations in China and India. The zone authority of Kenya has a strategic plan to achieve ISO 14001 certification for all zones in its territory. One zone in India goes further by actively encouraging all companies operating within the zone to become ISO 14001 certified.

The UNCTAD report is published today, ahead of its official launch on 17 December at the ‘Free Zones of the Future’ session at the WTO ministerial in Nairobi. The report examines the experience of eco-industrial parks in China, identifying commercial benefits that can arise from zones helping firms use each other’s by-products as resources. As a Global Managing Director with Accenture, Peter Lacy, explains: “Zone agencies have the opportunity to curate a circular economy among firms that operate in their zone. Firms can benefit from cost savings on waste, cheaper inputs, and a higher sustainability profile in markets that seek, and pay for, environmental quality.”

Despite these examples, UNCTAD’s survey of 100 zones found that the majority of zone management agencies were not sharing information on the services they provided to support firm compliance with national or international standards on labour, environment or anti-corruption issues. The report therefore revealed that there is more that zones can do to develop this new basis for competitiveness. To help zone agencies and their stakeholders the report puts forward a new ‘Framework for Sustainable Economic Zones.’

The coordinator of the research at UNCTAD, Anthony Miller, says:“this research and advice on zones seeks to assist member States’ in their implementation of the Global Goals.” He reports that “this work fits within the broader context of UNCTAD’s Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development which identifies a new generation of investment policies where inclusive growth and sustainable development are at the heart of efforts to attract investment.” Miller concludes that “zones have the potential – with the right policies in place – to become centres of excellence in corporate sustainability, attracting investment in ways that contribute to the new Global Goals. Instead of being areas of concern for social and environmental issues, zones could become model Sustainable Economic Zones and show the way forward for the rest of an economy.”

In light of the Global Goals to improve people’s lives in harmony with the environment, this work from UNCTAD sends a powerful message: we can and must start somewhere. Both the commercial and ethical arguments are clear: it is time for Enterprise Zones to play their part in achieving the Global Goals.

You can download the report here.

Author: Dr Jem Bendell is co-author of the UNCTAD report “Enhancing the Contribution of Export Processing Zones to the Sustainable Development Goals”, Professor of Sustainability Leadership at the University of Cumbria, Non-Executive Director with Trimantium Capital and a Young Global Leader.

Image: An aerial view shows workers at the Alltex export processing zone (EPZ) factory in Athi River, near the Kenyan capital Nairobi, July 31, 2009. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Economic Progress

Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Economic Progress is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

5 ways to go green: How countries can prioritize both equity and climate action

Harsh Vijay Singh and Attilio Di Battista

November 15, 2024

How the Global Alliance for Trade Facilitation helped unlock opportunities for small businesses in Cambodia

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum