Leadership

Is the need for 'cognitive closure' holding you back?

A cup of tea is seen on an office table at the Tregothnan Estate near Truro in Cornwall January 15, 2013. Tregothnan is bucking an historic trend by growing tea in England and exporting almost half of it abroad, including to tea-growing nations like China and India. Owned by a descendant of 19th century British Prime Minister Charles Grey, after whom the Earl Grey tea blend was named, the Tregothnan estate has been selling tea since 2005 and currently produces around 10 tonnes a year of tea and infusions.

How productive are you actually being? Image: REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth

Shana Lebowitz
Strategy Reporter, Business Insider

What time are you available for a phone call tomorrow? Can you sign off on this project proposal? How much pizza should we order for tomorrow's staff meeting?

Ugh. 2 p.m. Yes. 10 pies. Done.

You might feel incredibly productive after making these decisions, simply because you checked three items off your to-do list.

But efficiency isn't the same thing as productivity, especially if you've just made all the wrong choices.

That's according to Charles Duhigg, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author of the new book, "Smarter Faster Better," about the science of productivity.

In the book, Duhigg writes about the concept of "cognitive closure," which psychologists describe as "the desire for a confident judgment on an issue, any confident judgment, as compared to confusion and ambiguity." (You can test your need for cognitive closure here.)

The need for cognitive closure can be helpful, and Duhigg says that some level is necessary for success — no one ever got anywhere from debating a single decision forever.

On the other hand, a high need for cognitive closure can mean that you need to get stuff done even if you're not necessarily getting that stuff done right. It's the difference between feeling productive and actually being productive.

In an interview with Business Insider, Duhigg explained how a need for cognitive closure might play out in a meeting. You turn to the person next to you, a presumed expert on the topic, and say, "What should we do?" They give you an answer, and that's the end of that.

Again: efficient, but not necessarily productive.

So how do we prevent the need for cognitive closure from sabotaging our decisions?

Duhigg said it's about building systems that force us to "make sure that we're giving a choice the time it deserves."

During his research, he studied the most successful teams at Google, which are characterized by "psychological safety."

One hallmark of psychological safety, Duhigg said, is that "everyone has the opportunity to weigh in on big choices."

"That's not necessarily because everyone has a great idea," he said. Instead, it helps groups come to better decisions because it's "forcing people to justify the choices that they're making."

When you have to explain your decision to other people, you might spot some holes in your reasoning that you would have missed if you'd simply forged ahead.

Once teams form a habit of talking through big decisions, they'll minimize the impact of individuals' need for cognitive closure. Ultimately, that means they'll save time and energy because they won't have to revisit poor decisions and fix them in a frenzy.

More from Business Insider:

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

leadership

Related topics:
LeadershipJobs and the Future of Work
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of Work is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

Leadership for our times: Build on the past to create a better future

Ida Jeng Christensen and Raju Narisetti

October 29, 2024

Meeting the UN's SDGs takes new leadership — here's how it should look

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum