Nature and Biodiversity

How does air pollution harm unborn babies?

A policeman wearing a face mask stands on a road during a hazy day in Shanghai, January 20, 2014. Chinese steelmakers and power plants are being forced to shop around for higher-quality raw materials to meet tougher air pollution standards, a move that will be a boon for global mining giants that produce premium-grade iron ore and coal. Picture taken January 20, 2014.

Even low levels of air pollution raises the risk of a condition linked to premature births and lifelong health problems in children. Image: REUTERS/Aly Song

Stephanie Desmon
Director of Media Relations, Johns Hopkins University

Even low levels of air pollution appear to raise the risk of a condition linked to premature births and lifelong health problems in children, new research shows.

Fine particles from car exhaust, power plants, and other industrial sources are breathed in through the lungs, but scientists have found evidence of the effects of that pollution in pregnant women’s placentas.

The greater the exposure to air pollution, the more likely a pregnant woman will suffer from intrauterine inflammation, a condition that can increase the risk of health problems for her child from the fetal stage well into childhood and beyond.

The findings add to growing evidence that the air a pregnant woman breathes can have long-term health consequences for her baby.

“Twenty years ago, we showed that high levels of air pollution led to poor pregnancy outcomes, including premature births,” says senior author Xiaobin Wang, director of the Center on the Early Life Origins of Disease at Johns Hopkins’ Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Now we are showing that even small amounts of air pollution appear to have biological effects at the cellular level in pregnant women.”

US Environmental Protection Agency air pollution standards may not be tough enough to protect a developing fetus, the researchers warn.

“This study raises the concern that even current standards for air pollution may not be strict enough to protect the fetus, which may be particularly sensitive to environmental factors,” says lead author Rebecca Massa Nachman, a postdoctoral fellow in environmental health sciences. “We found biological effects in women exposed to air pollution levels below the EPA standard.”

For the study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, researchers analyzed data from 5,059 mother-child pairs in the Boston Birth Cohort, a predominantly low-income minority population. They assessed the presence of intrauterine inflammation by determining whether the mother had a fever during labor and by looking under a microscope at the placenta, which was collected and preserved after birth.

They assessed maternal exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution using data from EPA air quality stations located near the mothers’ homes. Boston, where the women lived, is known for relatively clean air. The majority of the women in the study were exposed to air pollution at a level that EPA deems acceptable, fewer than 12 micrograms per cubic meter. About 31 percent, however, had been exposed to air pollution at or above the EPA standard.

Pregnant women exposed to the highest levels of air pollution were nearly twice as likely as those exposed to the lowest levels to have intrauterine inflammation, with the first trimester appearing to be the time of highest risk. The results held up even when researchers accounted for other factors, including smoking, age, obesity, and education levels.

Intrauterine inflammation is one of the leading causes of premature birth, which occurs in one of every nine births in the United States and one in six African-American births. Babies born prematurely can have lifelong developmental problems. Preterm birth has been linked to both autism and asthma.

While maternal exposure to air pollution during pregnancy is associated with adverse birth outcomes, the biological mechanism has not been well understood. There are few outward signs of intrauterine inflammation in most women.

The Boston Birth Cohort is supported in part by the March of Dimes PERI grants, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Other philanthropic support for the research came from the Ludwig Family Foundation and the Zanvyl Krieger Endowment.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Future of Global Health and Healthcare

Related topics:
Nature and BiodiversityUrban Transformation
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Future of the Environment is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

How nature-positive cities are helping to create a more sustainable and resilient world

Arjun Dhawan and Nollaig Forrest

December 9, 2024

Unlocking renewable energy future in emerging markets

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum