The reason we have bigger brains than other primates
People need to drop the idea that the human brain is exceptional. Image: REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhur
There’s a surprisingly simple reason why human brains grew so large, even larger than the brains of gorillas and orangutans, whose bodies are larger than ours.
Those bigger brains were possible thanks to cooking, according to work by Suzana Herculano-Houzel, a neuroscientist at Vanderbilt University.
In her book The Human Advantage: A New Understanding of How Our Brain Became Remarkable (MIT Press, 2016), she explains that cooking allowed early humans to overcome the energetic barrier that limits the size of the brains of other primates.
Her latest research shows that when the human brains grew larger, they maintained the basic structure of the primate brain—including the size of the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal region of the brain orchestrates abstract thinking, complex planning, and decision-making.
The findings effectively put the final nail in the coffin of a long-standing theory to explain human’s remarkable cognitive abilities: that human evolution involved the selective expansion of the brain’s prefrontal cortex.
“People need to drop the idea that the human brain is exceptional,” says Herculano-Houzel. “Our brain is basically a primate brain. Because it is the largest primate brain, it does have one distinctive feature: It has the highest number of cortical neurons of any primate.
“Humans have 16 billion compared with 9 billion in gorillas and orangutans and six-to-seven billion in chimpanzees. It is remarkable, but it is not exceptional.”
Herculano-Houzel and postdoctoral fellow Mariana Gabi compared the brains of seven non-human primates of varying sizes—pig-tailed and crab-eating macaques, baboon, marmoset, galago, owl monkey, and capuchin—with the human brain. They found that both the human and non-human primates devote about 8 percent of their neurons to the prefrontal region of the cortex.
In addition, they determined that volumes of human prefrontal gray and white matter match the expected volumes for the number of neurons and other cells in the white matter when compared to other primates. The results appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
How we feed our big brains
Cooking allowed us to overcome an energetic barrier that restricts the size of the brains of other primates.
“Our big brains are very costly. They use 25 percent of all the energy the body needs each day,” Herculano-Houzel says. “Cooking allowed us to overcome an energetic barrier that restricts the size of the brains of other primates.”
Take the case of the gorilla. It must spend at least eight hours per day foraging and eating to support its body and brain. The human brain is three times larger than that of the gorilla. If a gorilla had a brain the size of a human, it would have to spend an additional one and a half hours a day finding food.
So there simply aren’t enough hours in the day for the gorilla to support a bigger brain. Likewise, if humans ate like any other primate, we would have to spend nine and a half hours per day eating—every single day.
That’s where cooking comes in. “By cooking, I mean cutting, dicing, smashing–all types of food preparation,” Herculano-Houzel says. “Take a single carrot. If you eat it raw, it will take 10 to 15 minutes of vigorous chewing and your digestive system will only capture about one third of the calories. But, if you cut the carrot up and cook it for a few minutes, it takes only a few minutes to consume and your body gets 100 percent of the calories.”
The origin of cooking, as Herculano-Houzel defines it, dates back about 2.5 million years ago with the development of the first stone tools. Among other things, these stone tools were humans’ first food processors, allowing our ancestors to slice and dice and mash their food. Evidence for the controlled use of fire appears about 400,000 years ago.
“Those early tool makers had brains about the same size as gorillas. But, beginning about 1.8 million years ago, the brains of our ancestors began growing steadily, tripling in size over the next 1.5 million years,” says Herculano-Houzel.
“It’s amazing that something we now take for granted, cooking, was such a transformational technology which gave us the big brains that have made us the only species to study ourselves and to generate knowledge that transcends what was observed firsthand; to tamper with itself, fixing imperfections with the likes of glasses, implants, and surgery and thus changing the odds of natural selection; and to modify its environment so extensively (for better and for worse), extending its habitat to improbable locations.”
Researcher from the Federal University of Rio De Janeiro were coauthors on the paper. Grants from the James S. McDonnell Foundation and the Mathers Foundation supported the work.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Neuroscience
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.