As Russia blocks LinkedIn: these countries already deny access to social networks
A court in Moscow has ruled that LinkedIn is violating Russian data storage law. Image: REUTERS/Thomas Peter
Russia's communications regulator has ordered internet service providers to block public access to social networking site LinkedIn to comply with a court ruling that found the firm guilty of violating data laws.
Domestic legislation, introduced in 2015, states that Russian citizens’ data must be stored on servers within the country - something Russia says LinkedIn does not do. LinkedIn has more than 6 million registered users in Russia, and it becomes the first major social network to be blocked by Russian authorities.
Not linked in
Russia joins an already substantial list of countries that prevent their citizens accessing social networks.
The governments of Pakistan, Vietnam, and Iran control the flow of information through the internet and some social media is blocked in these countries for citizens that aren’t using a Virtual Private Network (VPN).
Turkey’s appearance on the list is surprising in as much as the country is both a NATO member and a hopeful applicant to the European Union.
Turkey is also a functioning democracy, a fact which makes its regular blocking of social media all the more unusual.
China’s internet censorship is much more widely known, with all major social media services permanently blocked by the “great firewall”.
Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Google were all banned when Chinese officials claimed that social networking platforms were used to coordinate anti-government protests.
But even China’s censorship levels seem relatively relaxed when compared to North Korea. Social media in North Korea simply can’t exist, since the country has built an internal internet that is not connected to outside web sources.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no
There are many other countries that occasionally prevent access to certain networks. A growing number of African nations, for example, are ordering mobile networks to deny service during elections.
Various reasons are given from national security to the integrity of election result reporting.
It is worth noting that recent research found that African tweeters tend to be more political than tweeters in other continents. So it is appears that there, as in most places, fear of political unrest is often the key driver of internet restrictions.
This article has been updated.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Russian Federation
Related topics:
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.