Today is the 10th anniversary of the hashtag, here's how far it's come
Chris Messina explains why he let the hashtag become a free device. Image: REUTERS/Thomas White
Chris Messina, the former Google designer who first proposed that Twitter adopt the hashtag — or "pound" symbol, as it was called at the time — has explained on Quora why he never bothered to apply for a patent on the idea.
A patent could have given him ownership of hashtags as an HTML-activated device that allows Twitter users to sort their feeds by topic. In theory, he could have licensed hashtags to Twitter made a huge sum of money.
Of course, that's not what happened.
Messina first proposed that Twitter users use a hashtag to create "groups" back in 2007. Here is his famous, first-ever tweet using a hashtag:
how do you feel about using # (pound) for groups. As in #barcamp [msg]?
But Twitter rejected the idea, he later told the Wall Street Journal:
“[Twitter] told me flat out, ‘These things are for nerds. They’re never going to catch on.’”
Now, of course, even Facebook has adopted the hashtag as a news feed sorting mechanism. Twitter would be almost unusable without hot-linked hashtags.
On Quora, Messina explained why he chose to let the hashtag become a free device anyone can use and not a licensable product that he could have made money from:
1. claiming a government-granted monopoly on the use of hashtags would have likely inhibited their adoption, which was the antithesis of what I was hoping for, which was broad-based adoption and support — across networks and mediums.
2. I had no interest in making money (directly) off hashtags. They are born of the Internet, and should be owned by no one. The value and satisfaction I derive from seeing my funny little hack used as widely as it is today is valuable enough for me to be relieved that I had the foresight not to try to lock down this stupidly simple but effective idea.
Messina is now head of community and growth at Neonmob, an art trading web site.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Media, Entertainment and Sport
Forum Stories newsletter
Bringing you weekly curated insights and analysis on the global issues that matter.
More on Industries in DepthSee all
Jane Sun
December 18, 2024