Health and Healthcare Systems

Why protecting mosquitoes could be the key to tackling malaria

A displaced girl is tested for malaria at an MSF clinic in Tomping camp, where some 17,000 displaced people who fled their homes are being sheltered by the United Nations, in Juba January 10, 2014. Violence erupted in South Sudan's capital Juba in mid-December and spread to oil-producing regions and beyond, dividing the two-year-old land-locked country along ethnic lines. Some 60,000 civilians are being protected at U.N. Bases. REUTERS/Andreea Campeanu (SOUTH SUDAN - Tags: CIVIL UNREST SOCIETY HEALTH) - GM1EA1A1J0I01

Altered bacteria and mosquitoes could eventually be released into populations of wild mosquitoes. Image: REUTERS/Andreea Campeanu

Dennis O'Shea

Two new strategies show promise in battling malaria, a disease that kills more than 400,000 people each year, mostly children ages five and under in sub-Saharan Africa.

Both new strategies involve making Anopheles mosquitoes more resistant to malaria parasites, which live in the insects and infect humans when female mosquitoes feed on human blood.

Building mosquito resistance to the parasite would reduce the need for repeated, continuous use of other malaria control measures, such as insecticides and bed nets.

One team of researchers from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Malaria Research Institute discovered a strain of bacteria that can spread rapidly and persist long-term among malaria-carrying mosquitoes. They genetically modified the bacterial strain in a way that strongly suppresses development of malaria parasites, making mosquitoes much less likely to transmit parasites to humans.

A second team of researchers used a genetic modification to boost the immune system of malaria-carrying mosquitoes. The genetic change not only suppresses malaria parasites in the insects but also spreads quickly in a test population by changing mosquitoes’ mating preferences.

If the teams’ initial promising results continue to pan out, altered bacteria and mosquitoes eventually could be released into populations of wild mosquitoes. There, they would spread the genetic changes and eventually reduce malaria transmission to humans.

Image: World Health Organisation

Odd microbes

In the first study, the discovery of the new mosquito-infecting bacterial strain was a chance event.

“We were working with a different bacterium when a researcher on the project happened to find evidence of a bacterial colony in our mosquitoes’ ovaries,” says senior author Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, a professor of molecular microbiology and immunology. “That was unusual—normally we find bacteria only in the mosquito gut.”

His team soon characterized these odd microbes as a strain of Serratiabacteria, and dubbed them Serratia AS1.

Researchers have been developing genetically engineered bacteria that can infect mosquito populations and kill the malaria parasites the mosquitoes harbor, without harming the mosquitoes themselves. Getting such bacteria to spread efficiently has been a key challenge, but experiments revealed SerratiaAS1 is almost perfect for the task. Unlike other mosquito-infecting bacteria, Serratia AS1 turned out to be easily transmitted from males to females during mating and from female mosquitoes to their offspring.

The scientists modified Serratia AS1 by adding genes for five potent antimalarial proteins. Powered by the proteins, the bacteria strongly inhibited parasite development in colonized mosquitoes, reducing levels of an early stage of the parasite by more than 90 percent. Experiments also showed that the modified Serratia AS1 bacteria do not have a significant effect on lifespan or fertility of the mosquitoes themselves.

“So far all indications are that these anti-malarial proteins are universally effective against malaria parasites, and the Serratia AS1 bacteria that carry them can go into any malaria-carrying mosquito species,” Jacobs-Lorena says.

Changing mosquito mating preference

In the second study, a team led by George Dimopoulos, also a professor of molecular microbiology and immunology, made small modifications to the DNA of malaria-transmitting Anopheles mosquitoes to boost the activity of their immune genes. The enhanced immunity made the mosquitoes more resistant to infection by malaria parasites, and thus less likely to transmit the parasites to humans.

That result was expected. What was not expected was the unusually high efficiency with which the modified mosquitoes spread their genetic modification to later generations in a mixed population of modified and unmodified, wild-type mosquitoes.

Investigating this surprising result, Dimopoulos and colleagues found that boosting the mosquitoes’ immune genes also altered the mix of bacterial species in the mosquito intestine and reproductive organs. This change in the insect “microbiota” in turn led to a change in mating preferences: Modified male mosquitoes began to prefer unmodified, wild-type females, while wild-type males began to prefer modified females.

“We believe that, by changing the microbiota, we’re changing the scent of modified mosquitoes—which in turn alters mating preference,” Dimopoulos says. “It’s the perfect change in mating preference in this case, because it maximizes the chances of producing genetically modified offspring when mosquitoes compete for mates.”

Dimopoulos’s modified mosquito population has now been living in a colony in his laboratory for more than seven years, and has retained its high level of resistance to malaria for all that time without any apparent adverse side effects.

The two research groups describe their findings in the journal Science.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Bloomberg Philanthropies provided funding for both studies. The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Nature Science Foundation of China also funded the Jacobs-Lorena research.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

Global Health

Related topics:
Health and Healthcare SystemsGeographies in Depth
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how Global Health is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

What’s the difference between carbon negative and carbon neutral?

Emma Charlton

November 29, 2024

How to transform lung cancer outcomes in low- and middle-income countries

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum