How green is your Christmas tree?
Dark side of Christmas ... both real and artificial trees have a carbon footprint Image: REUTERS/Leon Kuegeler
What would Christmas be without a tree? Every year millions of people haul them home and festoon them with twinkling lights, tinsel and polished silver baubles. It’s a sign that the festive season has truly begun.
But there’s a darker side to that beautiful Christmas tree – it’s not always very eco-friendly.
Real or fake?
The debate about which are greener, real or artificial, has raged for years. Ultimately, it depends on a number of factors such as how far the tree has travelled, how much energy went into producing it and how it is recycled.
Plastic trees, usually made from PVC, are unlikely to be recyclable, and have probably travelled many miles to their destination. For instance, most fake trees (85%) in the US are imported from China.
A PVC tree needs to be reused for at least 20 years to make up for the amount of energy used in its production (although others put that figure at 10 years).
But a real Christmas tree that is sent to landfill also has a carbon footprint: as it decomposes, it produces methane.
Some consumers avoid real Christmas trees because they envisage swathes of forest being cut down.
But, in fact, most Christmas trees come from farms where they are specifically grown for that purpose.
Christmas tree farmers plant new seedlings every spring to replace those harvested, and the saplings can serve as important habitats for birds, insects and other wildlife.
They also provide employment – over 100,000 people are employed full- or part-time in the industry, and that’s just in the US.
Living trees
One way to get round these issues is to use a living tree. Living trees produce oxygen and suck up carbon dioxide. However, they are fairly small compared to cut Christmas trees, and usually only survive for around 10 days indoors. Another option is to buy a tree with roots, keep it well watered and replant in the garden or a large pot for the following year.
Some companies rent out trees. This one in the UK promises to replant the tree in a forest if it grows too big. This one in the US re-pots trees into larger containers and looks after them until the next Christmas.
Imaginative alternatives
There are also some more imaginative alternatives to the traditional Christmas tree, including “trees” made from cardboard, copper, wood or even plastic bottles.
Buying local also helps to reduce the tree’s carbon footprint, as does using energy-saving LED lights with a timer.
Recycling trees
When the festive season is over, how we choose to dispose of our Christmas trees also has an impact on the environment, as many end up in landfill.
At a dedicated recycling site, real trees can be turned into compost or wood chippings for use as biofuel. They can shore up flood defences, or be turned into food for fish and birds.
Don't miss any update on this topic
Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.
License and Republishing
World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.
Stay up to date:
Future of the Environment
The Agenda Weekly
A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda
You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.
More on Nature and BiodiversitySee all
Tania Strauss, Iliass El Fali and Pedro Gomez
November 22, 2024