Nature and Biodiversity

How your 'thank you' emails are polluting the planet

How many emails do you send a day? Image: Etienne Boulanger/Unsplash

Rosa Furneaux
  • If each adult sent one less email a day, Britain could reduce its carbon output by 16,433 tonnes - equal to more than 81,000 flights from London to Madrid
  • 71% of Britons said they wouldn't mind not receiving a 'thank you' email if it helped the environment

Britain could significantly cut its carbon footprint if people stopped sending unnecessary 'thank you' emails, researchers said, calling on the public to 'think before you thank'.

Britons send more than 64 million unnecessary emails per day, a study by energy supplier OVO Energy found, with unactionable pleasantries such as 'thank you' and 'thanks' topping the list of most common offenders.

"Is OVO asking everybody to be more rude? Absolutely not," said Mike Berners-Lee, an expert on carbon footprinting at Britain's Lancaster University who carried out the analysis.

Estimated reduction in carbon emissions if UK adults sent one less short email per day.
Sending one less 'thank you' email a day could save 16,433 tonnes of carbon a year. Image: Statista

"But if you send somebody a 'thanks' email, and they're only three metres away from you, it might be nice to just go over and say, thank you very much," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Have you read?

If each adult sent one less email a day, Britain could reduce its carbon output by 16,433 tonnes - equal to more than 81,000 flights from London to Madrid, the study found.

OVO Energy has created software to identify when a user has sent a potentially unnecessary email and prompt them to be more thoughtful.

The study found 49% of Britons frequently sent emails to colleagues within talking distance. Despite the country's penchant for politeness, 71% of Britons said they wouldn't mind not receiving a 'thank you' email if it helped the environment.

Don't miss any update on this topic

Create a free account and access your personalized content collection with our latest publications and analyses.

Sign up for free

License and Republishing

World Economic Forum articles may be republished in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License, and in accordance with our Terms of Use.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

Stay up to date:

United Kingdom

Related topics:
Nature and BiodiversityIndustries in Depth
Share:
The Big Picture
Explore and monitor how United Kingdom is affecting economies, industries and global issues
A hand holding a looking glass by a lake
Crowdsource Innovation
Get involved with our crowdsourced digital platform to deliver impact at scale
World Economic Forum logo
Global Agenda

The Agenda Weekly

A weekly update of the most important issues driving the global agenda

Subscribe today

You can unsubscribe at any time using the link in our emails. For more details, review our privacy policy.

5:18

Restoring Amazon ecosystems is better for the economy than ranching or logging. This expert explains

World set to breach 1.5°C warming limit in 2024, and other nature and climate stories you need to read this week

About us

Engage with us

  • Sign in
  • Partner with us
  • Become a member
  • Sign up for our press releases
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Contact us

Quick links

Language editions

Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Sitemap

© 2024 World Economic Forum